Author, Philosopher, Spiritual Teacher, A Lead Facilitator at Sacred Media's Integral Mastery Academy, Founder of Yinnergy Meditation/Neurofeedback, Bodhi Mental Care & Wellness, Co-founder of KeMor Centre for Innovative Development
When people argue about God, they often assume they are speaking about the same reality. Yet many disagreements arise because each person is referring to an entirely different understanding of God, one shaped by their own stage of psychological, cultural, and spiritual development.
Our concept of God often evolves as our own consciousness evolves.
An archaic understanding of God is rooted in survival. The divine is experienced as mysterious, unpredictable, and inseparable from the raw forces of nature. Fear and awe become the primary forms of worship because existence itself feels fragile.
A magical understanding sees God actively intervening in everyday events. Blessings, curses, rituals, omens, and supernatural signs become central. The world feels enchanted, and divine power appears to operate through symbolic acts and sacred objects.
A mythical understanding presents God through sacred stories, unquestionable doctrines, and absolute moral laws. Faithfulness often means loyalty to one’s tradition, while competing beliefs are viewed with suspicion or rejection.
A rational understanding asks difficult questions. Science, philosophy, evidence, and critical thinking become important. God may still exist, but beliefs are expected to withstand intellectual scrutiny rather than rely solely on tradition or revelation.
A pluralistic understanding recognizes wisdom across many religions and philosophies. Rather than insisting that one path possesses the whole truth, it appreciates the possibility that different traditions illuminate different aspects of the same mystery.
An integral understanding attempts to include every previous perspective without dismissing them. Each view is understood as expressing something meaningful within its own context. The question shifts from “Which one is right?” to “What truth is each perspective trying to reveal?”
A super integral understanding goes even further. God is no longer merely an object of belief or a concept to defend. The distinction between God, self, and reality begins to dissolve. Divinity is not encountered as something separate from experience. It is recognized as the very ground from which all experience arises. Every stage, every worldview, every certainty, and every doubt appears as an expression of the same limitless reality.
This progression does not suggest that one stage is morally superior to another or that everyone must follow the same sequence. Human development is complex, and people often embody several perspectives simultaneously depending on the circumstances.
The more interesting question is not whether God exists.
The more revealing question is this.
Which version of God are we talking about?
Our answer may reveal far more about the structure of our own consciousness than about God.
Perhaps the deepest spiritual maturity arrives when we no longer need God to conform to our ideas. Instead, we allow our ideas to dissolve into the mystery they were always pointing toward.
Some of you believe I am delusional or disconnected from reality because of the way I speak about consciousness. That conclusion makes sense if you assume I am denying the world you experience every day. I am not.
I am not saying that what you see, hear, smell, taste, touch, or feel internally is unreal. Those experiences undeniably occur. They shape your life, your relationships, your joys, and your suffering.
My point is something altogether different.
The mistake is assuming that experience is exactly what it appears to be.
Throughout history, humanity has repeatedly mistaken appearances for reality. The sun seemed to circle the Earth. Matter appeared solid and indivisible. Time felt absolute. Careful investigation revealed that each of these assumptions concealed a deeper truth.
Perhaps consciousness deserves the same level of investigation.
Ask yourself a simple question. What is it that allows every experience to appear at all?
Before you answer with the brain, the mind, or the senses, examine the question carefully. Those are themselves experiences. They are objects that appear within awareness. What is it that knows them?
That is the mystery worth solving.
No one can solve it for you.
I can tell you what I have realized, but my words are not your realization. Concepts may point, but they cannot replace direct recognition. Borrowed certainty only delays genuine discovery.
Many traditions have given this ultimate reality different names. God. Brahman. Allah. Source. Spirit. The Ground of Being. Each points toward something beyond language. Names are useful for conversation, but they are never the thing itself.
The destination cannot be captured by a label.
When this becomes more than an intellectual idea, something remarkable happens. The world does not disappear. Your senses continue to function. You still see, hear, smell, taste, touch, think, and feel.
What changes is your relationship to experience.
The world is no longer mistaken for the whole of reality. Every sight, every sound, every emotion, every thought becomes a single expression within something immeasurably greater.
The person you believed yourself to be also takes its proper place. Instead of standing apart from reality, it is recognized as one movement within it.
Nothing needs to be rejected.
Nothing needs to be escaped.
Only the assumption that appearances tell the whole story is questioned.
That investigation is not about adopting my conclusions or anyone else’s. It is about looking deeply enough that the answer reveals itself.
When it does, you may discover that what you have been searching for has never been absent.
Many of you have called me a blasphemer. If your understanding of God is built upon a supernatural being who exists somewhere beyond the universe, then I understand why you would arrive at that conclusion.
From that perspective, questioning sacred beliefs is an offense. Challenging religious certainty becomes rebellion. Refusing to bow before inherited ideas appears arrogant or dangerous.
I understand the reaction.
My position changes completely once the word God points to something fundamentally different.
Suppose God is not a person with preferences, opinions, or emotions. Suppose God is not a cosmic ruler who rewards belief and punishes doubt. Suppose God is the infinite reality from which every experience, every atom, every thought, every galaxy, and every conscious being arises.
What, then, could blasphemy possibly mean?
Can a wave insult the ocean?
Can space offend itself?
Can existence commit a crime against existence?
The charge of blasphemy assumes separation. It assumes there is a believer over here, a divine authority over there, and a boundary between the two that can be violated.
Direct realization dissolves that boundary.
This is not an invitation to disrespect religious traditions. Many traditions contain extraordinary wisdom. Their symbols, rituals, and stories have guided countless people toward compassion, humility, and profound insight.
The difficulty begins when symbols are mistaken for literal reality.
History shows that nearly every major breakthrough has been labeled dangerous by those invested in preserving the familiar. Scientific discoveries, philosophical revolutions, and spiritual insights have often been condemned before they were understood.
Perhaps the same pattern appears in discussions about God.
If God is truly infinite, then every sincere investigation into reality is already taking place within God. Honest questioning cannot threaten what is absolute. Curiosity cannot diminish infinity. Truth has nothing to fear from examination.
Perhaps what people call blasphemy is sometimes only the sound of certainty encountering a perspective it has never considered.
The greatest obstacle may not be disbelief.
It may be believing we already know what the word God refers to.
Looking at the issue rationally, however, reveals a far more complicated picture.
Some people making these claims are undoubtedly mistaken. Others may be describing something genuine, yet only from the perspective of a single life. Personal realization, no matter how profound, is still a sample size of one. Direct experience carries immense value, but it does not automatically reveal the complete mechanism behind the experience.
Every few years, someone claims to have uncovered the science of spiritual enlightenment. Some speak from decades of disciplined practice. Others present neuroscience, psychology, or contemplative research as evidence. I have made similar claims myself, based on my own direct experience.
Another complication lies in language. Not everyone who undergoes a profound shift calls it enlightenment. Some describe it as psychological freedom, ego dissolution, awakening, union with God, self-realization, mystical consciousness, or simply becoming fully present. Others never place a label on it at all. Entire populations may have experienced comparable transformations while using completely different conceptual frameworks.
Bias enters the conversation from every direction. Traditions often assume their own methods are uniquely effective while dismissing others. Skeptics sometimes reject extraordinary claims before examining the evidence. Devotees may accept them without sufficient scrutiny. Researchers may overlook valuable observations because they originate outside established academic institutions. Teachers may overestimate the universality of their own path because it worked for them.
Perhaps the largest blind spot receives surprisingly little attention.
Survivorship bias.
We primarily hear from those who report success.
They successfully write books. They appear on podcasts. They teach retreats, facilitate workshops, and attract students eager to follow their path. Their stories become the data set from which future seekers attempt to reverse engineer enlightenment.
Far less attention is given to everyone else.
What about those who devoted twenty years to meditation without reaching the destination they sought?
What about practitioners who quietly concluded the pursuit was not for them?
What about individuals whose lives improved significantly through practice but who never considered themselves enlightened?
What about those whose deepest realization occurred privately, with no desire to teach or publish?
What about those whose greatest insight arose during the final moments of biological life, leaving no opportunity to communicate what they discovered?
These voices rarely become part of the conversation.
Without them, our understanding may be fundamentally incomplete.
Imagine trying to understand the science of becoming an Olympic athlete by interviewing only gold medalists. Their insights would be invaluable, yet thousands of equally dedicated athletes who trained just as hard but fell short would possess information that is every bit as important. Their experiences might reveal overlooked variables, hidden obstacles, ineffective assumptions, or simply the role of chance.
The search for enlightenment may suffer from the same limitation.
If every authentic teacher described exactly how awakening unfolded, we would still be missing the experiences of everyone who practiced with equal sincerity but arrived somewhere else. That absence distorts the picture.
Adding another layer of complexity, we have yet to reach universal agreement on what enlightenment actually is. Is it permanent nondual awareness? Freedom from psychological suffering? Stable witness consciousness? Complete ego transcendence? Union with God? A measurable neurological state? Or are these different expressions of a broader phenomenon?
Without a shared definition, comparing outcomes becomes extraordinarily difficult.
Some scientists argue that the mystery has already been solved through neuroscience, predictive processing, or cognitive models of consciousness. Others remain unconvinced, pointing out that many proposed explanations have yet to withstand broad scientific scrutiny. The debate continues because the available evidence remains incomplete.
Personally, I know several people who have undergone profound spiritual awakenings. Their lives changed in unmistakable ways. Yet I know even more people who abandoned the search altogether, or whose goals were never enlightenment in the first place. Most of them will never write a memoir or appear in a documentary. Their experiences remain invisible.
Ironically, those invisible experiences may hold some of the most valuable clues.
Perhaps solving the mystery of enlightenment requires more than studying those who claim to have arrived. Perhaps it requires listening just as carefully to those who did not, those who stopped searching, those who never used spiritual language, and those whose stories were never recorded.
The greatest breakthrough may not come from discovering another enlightened teacher.
It may come from finally paying attention to everyone we forgot to ask.
Atheistic, theistic, monotheistic, polytheistic, pantheistic, panentheistic, dualistic, and nondualistic. Each of these appears to contradict the others. Each claims to describe reality from a different standpoint. Each attracts devoted followers who often believe their view excludes the rest.
The contradiction exists only while the mind insists on separation. Every philosophy arises from a particular level of perception, development, experience, or realization. Each reveals something genuine, yet none can contain the whole.
The atheist may reject a personal God while recognizing the lawful order of existence. The theist experiences a living relationship with the Divine. The monotheist discovers unity through one supreme source. The polytheist encounters the many faces of the sacred. The pantheist sees God as the universe itself. The panentheist recognizes that the universe exists within God, while God also transcends it. The dualist experiences an apparent distinction between self and reality. The nondualist awakens to the absence of all separation.
None of these perspectives are necessarily false. They become limiting only when they declare themselves to be the final word.
Reality has an extraordinary capacity to express itself through countless perspectives without ever becoming divided. Like light passing through different lenses, the same truth appears in different forms depending on the conditions through which it is perceived.
Absolute Monism does not choose one worldview over another. It includes them all without becoming confined by any of them.
At that level, every distinction dissolves. The categories no longer compete because the awareness that created the categories has been recognized as prior to them. The question is no longer which philosophy is correct. The question becomes, what remains when every concept, every belief, every religion, every denial, and every affirmation are seen as movements within the same indivisible reality?
That recognition is not another philosophy. It is the end of needing one.
The ultimate truth is not found by defending a position. It is found when every position is seen as an expression of the One that has never been divided.
Enlightenment is often described as universal. The realization itself does not belong to any nation, religion, or culture. Awareness is not Indian. Awareness is not Western. It is beyond every identity we create. Yet the way enlightenment unfolds in a person’s life can be dramatically shaped by the society surrounding them.
Culture does not determine awakening. It determines how awakening is received.
Imagine two people who have arrived at the same profound realization. Both have seen through the illusion of a separate self. Both recognize consciousness as the ground of existence. Both live from the same awakened awareness. One lives in India. The other lives in North America.
Their inner reality may be identical, yet their daily lives could hardly look more different.
For thousands of years, India has preserved traditions that regard liberation as one of life’s highest possibilities. Spiritual practice has long been woven into ordinary life. Terms such as moksha, samadhi, karma, and nonduality have existed within the public imagination for centuries. Even those who have never experienced awakening may understand that such a possibility exists.
This creates an environment where an awakened person is more likely to be recognized, supported, or even sought out. Teachers often emerge naturally because there are students looking for guidance. Communities exist where silence is respected, contemplation is encouraged, and the pursuit of truth is considered a meaningful way to live.
The modern West developed along a different path.
Scientific inquiry, technological progress, economic productivity, and personal achievement became dominant values. These accomplishments have brought extraordinary advances, yet they have also shaped how unusual states of consciousness are interpreted. A person describing the disappearance of the separate self may be viewed through psychological, neurological, or philosophical lenses before being understood spiritually.
An awakened individual may therefore continue working a regular job, paying bills, raising children, or quietly practicing meditation without ever speaking publicly about their realization. Some remain anonymous for life, not because their realization is incomplete, but because the culture offers few places where such understanding is easily recognized.
This contrast raises an interesting question.
How many enlightened individuals have lived unnoticed simply because no one around them possessed the language to recognize what had occurred?
History remembers the great sages whose teachings survived. It says very little about those who awakened while working in factories, teaching classrooms, repairing automobiles, or sitting alone in apartments overlooking crowded cities.
Perhaps enlightenment has always been far more common than we imagine.
Recognition depends not only upon realization itself but also upon whether a culture has developed the capacity to perceive it.
A society that values external success may overlook inner freedom. A society that values inner realization may overlook worldly achievement. Neither perspective is complete by itself.
Human development reaches its fullest expression when both dimensions mature together. Outer progress improves civilization. Inner realization transforms the one experiencing civilization.
Neither India nor the West possesses the whole picture.
One has preserved profound maps of consciousness. The other has demonstrated remarkable advances in science, medicine, and human rights. Perhaps the future belongs to neither tradition alone, but to a deeper integration where wisdom and innovation develop side by side.
When awakening no longer appears unusual, humanity itself may have entered a new stage of development.
The question may not be whether enlightenment belongs more naturally to East or West.
The deeper question is whether humanity is becoming mature enough to recognize it wherever it appears.
Most people eventually outgrow their childhood ideas about almost everything.
Our tastes in food become more refined. Our understanding of relationships deepens. Our appreciation for music changes. Fashion evolves. Culture shifts. Even our political, moral, and philosophical views often undergo profound transformation as life teaches us new lessons.
Yet there is one idea that frequently remains frozen in time.
Paradise.
For many adults, heaven still resembles the picture they accepted as children. A beautiful place somewhere above the clouds where good people are rewarded, reunited with loved ones, and live happily forever. Although our understanding of nearly every other aspect of life matures, our image of paradise often remains untouched.
Why?
The answer may have less to do with religion than with psychological development.
Paradise Grows as Consciousness Grows
Every stage of psychological development interprets reality according to its own capacity. Paradise is no exception.
The earliest stage is concerned only with survival. Paradise simply means warmth, food, shelter, and freedom from danger.
As tribal consciousness develops, paradise becomes reunion with ancestors, spirits, and one’s people. Belonging is eternal.
The egocentric stage imagines paradise as limitless pleasure, power, success, and personal fulfillment. Heaven exists for the individual.
The mythic stage transforms paradise into a divine kingdom governed by justice. Those who obey are rewarded. Those who reject divine law are excluded. This is where many traditional religious images of heaven take shape.
The rational stage begins questioning whether heaven exists at all. Paradise may become symbolic, psychological, or simply an unanswered mystery.
The pluralistic stage opens paradise to everyone. Love replaces exclusivity. Compassion becomes more important than belief. Humanity itself becomes the family.
Integral consciousness recognizes that every previous view reflects a particular stage of development rather than an absolute truth. Paradise is increasingly understood as a way of being rather than merely a destination.
Finally, holistic consciousness dissolves the distinction altogether. Paradise is not somewhere else. Reality itself is recognized as the living expression of the Absolute.
The Expanding Circle of Identity
Our understanding of paradise also changes according to the size of our identity.
The egocentric perspective asks:
“How do I get into heaven?”
The ethnocentric perspective asks:
“Which group is chosen?”
The worldcentric perspective asks:
“How can everyone be included?”
The Kosmocentric perspective asks something entirely different.
“Who is it that seeks paradise in the first place?”
Here, the search begins to collapse.
The seeker, the destination, and the journey are all recognized as appearances within one indivisible reality.
Why Do We Stay Attached to Childhood Images?
Children require certainty.
Simple stories offer comfort in the face of death and uncertainty. Those early images become emotionally rooted long before critical thinking fully develops.
Unlike our opinions about careers, relationships, or politics, our beliefs about paradise are rarely revisited with the same willingness to question them. Religious traditions often preserve these images because they provide stability, identity, and hope.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that.
Every stage serves an important purpose.
Problems arise only when we assume that the understanding which comforted us at age five must also satisfy us at age fifty.
The Ultimate Shift
The greatest transformation may not involve discovering a better description of heaven.
It may involve recognizing that paradise was never meant to describe a location.
Perhaps heaven is a symbol pointing toward a realization.
A realization that nothing has ever existed outside the infinite.
A realization that separation was never ultimately real.
A realization that the very awareness reading these words is not traveling toward paradise.
It is the ground from which every idea of paradise has always appeared.
Perhaps the deepest question is not whether heaven exists after death.
Perhaps the deeper question is whether consciousness can awaken enough to recognize paradise before death.
If consciousness itself is the Absolute, then paradise is no longer a promise waiting in the future.
It is reality, seen without the illusion of separation.
This is not simply about affirmations, positive thinking, manifestation, or the power of spoken language. Those ideas remain close to the surface. The deeper meaning reaches beyond the human voice, personal intention, and the individual mind.
You speak everything into existence and do not even realize it.
At the causal level, existence itself is your expression.
Every form that appears, every movement that unfolds, every event that arises, and every world that seems to exist independently emerges from the same beginningless source that you are.
Nothing stands outside of you.
The birth of a star, the movement of a thought, the falling of a leaf, the ending of a relationship, the formation of a galaxy, and the smallest shift within a single cell all belong to one indivisible happening.
That happening has no external author.
It is not being imposed upon reality from somewhere beyond reality.
Existence is expressing itself as everything.
The One Who Speaks Without a Voice
Human beings usually associate creation with deliberate action. Someone decides, acts, and produces a result. Cause appears to precede effect. A person speaks, and something happens.
Causal consciousness does not operate according to this linear sequence.
The voice that speaks existence into being has no mouth. It does not form sentences, construct plans, or choose between possibilities. Its speech is the spontaneous appearance of existence itself.
Mountains are its language.
Bodies are its language.
Silence is its language.
Time, space, matter, thought, sensation, memory, desire, birth, and death are all movements of this wordless declaration.
Creation is not something that occurred once in a remote past. Reality is being spoken now, not through verbal commands, but through the continuous emergence of experience.
You are that emergence.
A Beginningless Beginning
The mind wants to locate a first moment. It asks what started everything, what existed prior to the universe, and what caused the original cause.
These questions assume that reality began somewhere within time.
Time itself is part of what appears.
There was no first moment in the ordinary sense because the causal source does not occupy a position on a timeline. It is not an ancient object hiding behind the universe. It is the timeless ground through which every apparent beginning and ending becomes possible.
Existence is beginningless because the source of existence was never born.
The body had a beginning.
The personality had a beginning.
Your memories had a beginning.
The awareness within which these beginnings are known has no discoverable starting point.
Search directly for the birth of awareness. A memory may arise, but the memory appears within awareness. A story may explain your origin, yet that story is also being witnessed. Every answer appears as another object within the very presence you are attempting to explain.
The source remains prior to every explanation, not earlier in time, but more fundamental than time.
Everything Is Caused by You
The statement “everything is caused by you” can easily be misunderstood.
The personal ego did not manufacture the universe. Your everyday identity is not secretly controlling weather patterns, global events, other people, or every difficulty that enters your life. Such an interpretation would reduce a nondual insight to spiritual grandiosity.
The “you” being described is not the person.
It is the causal ground appearing as the person.
Every cause and every effect arises within the same undivided reality. The hand that acts, the object acted upon, the action itself, and the consequence are not ultimately separate events. They are distinctions created by perception and thought within one continuous movement.
Reality causes itself through itself.
Fire burns wood. Rain nourishes soil. Gravity draws bodies together. Choices alter lives. Countless visible and invisible conditions shape every outcome.
At the relative level, these causes remain meaningful. At the deepest level, none of them operates outside the whole.
Every cause is reality acting.
Every effect is reality receiving its own action.
Both are you, prior to the identity you call yourself.
The Dream of Separation
Separation creates the impression that life is happening to you.
Events seem external. Other people appear completely outside of you. Circumstances arrive from a world that feels independent of your being. You experience yourself as one vulnerable centre among billions of competing centres.
From the causal perspective, the division between inner and outer has not yet formed.
The person, the world, and the experience of the world arise together. A sound cannot appear apart from hearing. A colour cannot appear apart from seeing. A thought cannot appear apart from awareness. The perceived and the perceiver are born within the same act of knowing.
This does not mean physical differences disappear. Your body remains distinct from another body. Your thoughts are not automatically available to someone else. Practical boundaries continue to matter.
Nonduality does not deny difference.
It reveals that difference does not require absolute separation.
Waves differ in shape, force, duration, and direction, yet no wave contains a substance separate from the ocean. Each wave is the ocean taking temporary form.
Your individuality is real as an expression.
It is not independent as an existence.
Your Words Are Part of the Creative Movement
Spoken words still matter.
Language shapes attention, reinforces beliefs, influences relationships, and directs human action. Words can open possibilities or close them. They can encourage, deceive, wound, clarify, liberate, or imprison.
Yet words do not create reality from outside reality. They are movements through which reality modifies its own appearance.
A thought arises.
The body gives it sound.
Another nervous system receives it.
Meaning forms.
Behaviour changes.
A new sequence of events begins.
What appears to be one person speaking to another is existence communicating with itself through two localized expressions.
The same consciousness speaks and listens.
The same reality questions and answers.
The same source forgets itself, seeks itself, and recognizes itself.
Even the person who insists that words have no creative power is using words to introduce that position into existence.
The Causal Level Is Not Personal Control
Causal realization should never be confused with personal omnipotence.
The ego hears “you caused everything” and imagines itself sitting at the centre of the universe, commanding events according to personal desire. It wants authorship, ownership, recognition, and control.
The causal Self requires none of these.
It does not stand over existence as a ruler directing creation from a distance. It is creation itself, appearing as every ruler and every subject, every command and every refusal, every desire and every disappointment.
Your personal mind cannot decide every outcome because your personal mind is itself an outcome. Its thoughts arise through biology, memory, conditioning, culture, language, environment, and countless forces it did not independently choose.
Yet all of these forces arise within the greater reality that you are.
The individual is not the controller of the whole.
The individual is one of the ways the whole moves.
Responsibility Without Blame
Recognizing yourself as the causal ground does not mean blaming yourself for every painful event.
Blame belongs to the psychological self. It assumes that a separate person should have controlled conditions that were often far beyond personal control.
Causal responsibility is different.
It is not guilt.
It is inseparability.
Nothing can be dismissed as completely unrelated to the whole. Suffering anywhere occurs within the same reality that appears here as you. Compassion becomes more than a moral obligation because the apparent other is not entirely other.
When you harm another, existence wounds itself through your actions.
When you care for another, existence responds to itself with tenderness.
When you become more conscious, reality becomes conscious of its own movement at this particular point of expression.
This recognition does not erase accountability.
It deepens it.
Your actions matter because no action is truly isolated. Every gesture enters a field of consequences. Every word travels farther than the speaker can measure. Every choice becomes part of conditions that shape what follows.
The Silence Prior to Creation
What exists prior to the universe being spoken?
Not an empty void waiting for sound.
Not a distant deity preparing to create.
Not a hidden object concealed behind appearances.
There is only the unformed capacity for everything, silent not because nothing is present, but because no distinction has yet arisen.
That silence remains here beneath every experience.
Thoughts do not destroy it.
Sounds do not interrupt it.
Movement does not leave it.
The entire universe appears as a modulation of what never moves.
You are that stillness and every vibration arising within it.
You are the silence and the spoken world.
You are the causal depth from which existence emerges, the forms through which it becomes visible, and the awareness through which it knows itself.
Everything is caused by you because there is no second reality available to cause it.
Everything is spoken by you because every voice belongs to the same beginningless source.
Everything is you, not as possession, not as personal achievement, but as the indivisible fact of being.
Even Opposition Is Your Creation
Some will say this is egotistical.
That judgment, too, has been spoken into existence by the same beginningless reality.
The one who agrees, the one who resists, the one who mocks, the one who rejects, and the one who opposes are not standing outside the whole. Their objections are movements of the same source.
Even opposition is reality appearing to argue with itself.
You created that into existence as well.
Not you as the personality, but you as the undivided ground from which every voice, criticism, affirmation, denial, and misunderstanding arises.
Even all who oppose you are you appearing in another form, defending another viewpoint, expressing another movement within the totality.
Nothing escapes what you are.
Not praise.
Not resistance.
Not disbelief.
Not condemnation.
Not the accusation of arrogance.
The ego may say, “I created everything.”
Truth says, “There is no separate I and no separate everything.”
The accusation of egotism assumes that an isolated person is claiming personal ownership over existence. Nondual realization makes no such claim. It dissolves the presumed owner along with everything the owner hoped to possess.
There is only the beginningless whole appearing as creator, creation, believer, skeptic, supporter, opponent, accusation, defence, and the silence holding them all.
The question is no longer whether you are creating reality.
The deeper question is this:
Who are you before the one who claims to be the creator appears?
Join us for Bodhi in the Brain: Sonic Soul Bath, a deeply immersive evening of meditation, rest, and sound. This experience blends urban music, R&B, hip hop, soul, and meditative soundscapes with deeply embedded sonic brainwave entrainment to support relaxation, inner stillness, emotional release, and nervous system regulation.
Bring your sleeping bag, yoga mat, and pillow, and allow yourself to fully unwind.
Date: July 2 Time: 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM Doors Open: 6:30 PM Location: The Sanctuary at Vitality BioMed, #280 – 7015 Macleod Trail SW, Calgary, Alberta
For adults 18+.
Parking is available along 69th Ave SW, in the free lot across from Master Chocolate, or in the nearby Indigo pay lot.
Come rest, reset, and experience Bodhi in the Brain in Calgary.
Recent headlines have focused on the emergence of the world’s first trillionaire. For most people, a trillion dollars is a number so vast that it becomes almost impossible to comprehend. We can imagine a thousand dollars. We can stretch our imagination toward a million. A billion already feels distant. A trillion enters a realm where numbers lose their intuitive meaning.
The fascination with such wealth is understandable. A trillion dollars represents influence, freedom, opportunity, and power on a scale few human beings have ever approached. It appears to be the pinnacle of worldly success.
Yet even a trillion dollars has a limitation.
It is finite.
No matter how large the number becomes, it remains measurable. It exists within the world of acquisition, ownership, and accumulation. It can increase. It can decrease. It can be gained and lost.
Spiritual awakening belongs to an entirely different category.
On December 14, 2019, I experienced what can only be described as a full spiritual awakening. What occurred during that event permanently altered my understanding of reality. The experience was not merely profound, emotional, or mystical. It revealed something prior to all experiences.
The separate self that I had assumed myself to be dissolved. The boundary between observer and observed disappeared. What remained was an indescribable recognition of reality as a seamless whole. Words such as Brahman, nirvana, moksha, Buddha Nature, or the Absolute point toward it, but none can adequately capture it.
Whenever people hear accounts of awakening, they naturally search for comparisons. How intense was it? How meaningful was it? How extraordinary was it?
The difficulty is that every comparison comes from the world of ordinary experience.
Imagine possessing a trillion dollars.
Then imagine multiplying that wealth by a trillion.
Then multiplying it again by another trillion.
Even such numbers fail as a meaningful comparison because awakening is not an experience among other experiences. It is the recognition of that within which all experiences arise.
Money exists within consciousness.
The realization of the Absolute reveals consciousness itself.
This is why history’s awakened sages have consistently spoken of enlightenment as humanity’s greatest discovery. Not because it grants power, status, or possessions, but because it ends the search for fulfillment in things that are inherently temporary.
A trillionaire may possess unimaginable wealth and still wonder who they are.
A trillionaire may possess unimaginable wealth and still fear loss, suffering, and death.
The realization of the Absolute addresses a deeper question altogether.
Who is the one seeking?
That is why I call this essay The Poverty of the Trillionaire.
Not because wealth is bad.
Not because success is meaningless.
But because even the greatest fortune imaginable remains small beside the direct realization of one’s true nature.
Morgan O. Smith 